Tractor in field
— Area 02

Agricultural Investment

Backing what
South Sudan can grow.

Large-scale farming projects and processing plants — flour mills, edible-oil refining, grain storage — to reduce the country’s reliance on food imports.

01

Overview

The most strategic sector in our investment thesis.

Funding large-scale farming projects or processing plants (like flour mills) to reduce the country’s reliance on imports.

South Sudan imports most of what it eats. Every container of wheat flour, edible oil, or sugar we move across the border is also a candidate for local production. Our agriculture thesis is plain: substitute imports where domestic land, water, and labour make it feasible — and capture the margin currently paid to foreign exporters.

02

Investment thesis

Three high-conviction plays.

01

Processing

Flour milling

Replace imported wheat and maize flour with local milling capacity. Anchored by stable institutional demand from food-aid programmes, government, and urban bakeries.

Tenure

8–12 years

Demand anchor

Food aid + retail

02

Production

Large-scale farming

Mechanised commercial farms producing the grains and pulses currently imported — sorghum, maize, beans — with offtake into food-aid procurement.

Tenure

10–15 years

Demand anchor

WFP-aligned

03

Infrastructure

Grain storage & oil pressing

Silos, dryers, and edible-oil pressing plants — the missing midstream that lets domestic harvests reach market without spoilage or quality loss.

Tenure

7–12 years

Demand anchor

Trade buyers

03

Strategic angle

Import substitution is national policy.

The government has consistently prioritised reducing food import dependency. Agricultural projects that align with this aim find faster permitting, friendlier tax treatment, and sympathetic ministerial engagement.

Our agriculture deals are positioned within that policy direction — framed as economic-sovereignty investment, not just commercial ventures.